Chapter 13

General Relativity and the Ether

"Classification of mathematical problems as linear and nonlinear is like

classification of the Universe as bananas and non-bananas."

Unknown

Altitude and the H-K

As far as the H-K is concerned, General Relativity ("GR") is concerned with

gravity. Gravity, of course, is stronger near the surface of the earth as opposed

to at high altitudes. The intent of this chapter is to explain how ether and ether

drag can logically and easily explain the "altitude" or GR portion of the H-K

experiment. Other topics will also be discussed.

Hafele and Keating predicted, because of GR, that at higher altitudes the atomic

clocks would operate at a faster speed. And, of course, they were right. At the

higher altitudes, gravity is less potent, and the atomic clocks actually measured

time faster than time measured at ground level. Other experiments have also

verified this.

It should be remembered that these are "actual time" changes. The direction of

the flights had no affect on the GR portion of the data.

Sometimes an experiment gives us clearer insight into a phenomenon. Tesla

described ether much like a person would describe a hydrogen gas atom.

Whether this is right or not, it is important to know whether ether is compressible

and whether it is compressible by the earth’s gravity? The Hafele-Keating

experiment gives us the answer. Since the atomic clocks operated faster at

higher altitudes, it is logical to say that there is less resistance (i.e. FROS) to the

cesium atoms at higher altitudes. Thus, if the FROS is less at higher altitudes,

the density of ether must be less at higher altitudes. This means that the density

of the ether is a function of gravity. This, in fact, makes perfect sense when

thinking about the Tesla model of ether. Certainly, our atmosphere is the key,

both our atmosphere (i.e. the air) and ether "thin out" at higher altitudes.

Since the density of ether is directly proportional to the strength of gravity (this is

not an accident, it is a clear "cause and effect" relationship), it is clear that the

FROS formulas for altitude would be similar, if not exactly the same, as the GR

formulas for altitude (at least as far as measurable and verifiable formulas are

119

concerned). The variation of density by altitude is also a strong indication that

gravity is what is holding the ether drag to the earth.

It should be mentioned, however, that the "density" of ether may not be a matter

of ethons becoming physically further apart at the higher altitudes. It may be an

issue of energy. For example, if gravity energizes ether (or vice versa), the

ethons may be the same physical distance apart at higher altitudes, but the

energy levels of the ethons may less, and thus provide less resistance to the

electrons in the atomic clocks at higher altitudes.

In any case, Hafele and Keating did make a major discovery in their experiment,

but it was not the one they thought they had made. They discovered that the

"density" of ether varies by altitude and thus FROS varies by altitude and thus

"time" varies by altitude.

Can Ether Be A Solid?

While the reader may think that this book favors the theory that ether is a gas,

such is not the case. Is ether a gas or a liquid or a solid? The answer is

probably "none of the above."

Knowing that ether drag exists, how could ether be a solid? The answer is that if

ether were a solid, the earth's gravity could locally "energize" the ether as it

travels through the ether, thus giving the illusion that there is physical ether drag.

But there is a problem with this theory as I will now explain.

In this discussion, the reader must keep in mind the difference between ether

(i.e. "ethons") and the signal traveling through the ether (i.e. light). This is

similar to separating in our minds the difference between "air" and "sound."

Consider a fiber optic cable that spans 100 kilometers. During the time the fiber

optic signal is traveling down the fiber cable, the earth and the fiber itself are

moving towards Leo at 370 kps. If ether were a solid, the earth and the fiber

optic cable would be traveling through the ether at 370 kps. We know that the

signal does not travel with the earth towards Leo, or else the signal could not

stay inside the cable for 100 km. But it is possible that the signal does stay

within the cable, while the cable itself travels through the ether at 370 kps.

This is difficult to understand so let me provide a metaphor. Suppose you have a

long cylinder of chicken wire (chicken wire is mostly air, the wires are very thin

and are very far apart), which has a radius of 1 meter and a length of 100 km.

Suppose this chicken wire is towed underwater by two tug boats at 10 kph. The

tube of chicken wire is perpendicular to the direction of the tug boats. While it is

being towed, someone shoots a water balloon down the length of the chicken

wire at 30 kph. The chicken wire (i.e. the fiber optic cable) will travel through the

120

water (i.e. the ether) as if the water wasn't even there. However, the water

balloon (i.e. the signal) is confined to stay within the chicken wire. It cannot leave

the chicken wire. This is an example of how to separate the ether (i.e. the water)

from the signal (i.e. the water balloon). The mirrored surface inside of the fiber

optic cable would act as the chicken wire. It would contain the signal, but would

travel through the ether as if it weren't there.

Thus, if there were no physical ether drag (i.e. ether was a solid), the cable (i.e.

the chicken wire) would be traveling through the ether (i.e. the water) at the same

speed as the planet. However, the signal (i.e. the laser beam) would be confined

to staying within the fiber optic cable (i.e. the chicken wire).

However, if a laser is fired in open-air there would be no mirrored fiber optic

cable to contain the signal. It would make sense that the signal would attach

itself to the ether, which is assumed to be a solid in this case. If so, we could

easily detect that the signal is attached to the ether, not the earth (i.e. not to the

fiber that is attached to the earth). In my first experiment, if this were the case, I

would have clearly gotten an ellipse! But my experiments make it clear that the

signal is not attached to the ether (this discussion is assuming that ether is a

solid). It is for exactly this reason that I personally reject the theory that ether is a

solid (at least the ether that light travels through as a signal, there may be other

kinds of ether). It makes logical sense that in open-air the signal would attach

itself to the ether, not the earth, even if the earth energized the ether particles as

it passed by them. In any case, that is my opinion.

The priority of this book is to deal with the existence of ether, not to speculate as

to "what" it is. This book will refer to ether as a gas or liquid (i.e. fluid), but this is

only for convenience.

121